🔗 Share this article

Thhese times showcase a quite distinctive situation: the first-ever US procession of the babysitters. They vary in their expertise and attributes, but they all possess the common goal – to prevent an Israeli violation, or even devastation, of the delicate truce. Since the conflict concluded, there have been scant occasions without at least one of the former president's delegates on the scene. Only this past week included the arrival of Jared Kushner, a businessman, a senator and a political figure – all appearing to execute their assignments.

The Israeli government occupies their time. In only a few days it launched a wave of strikes in Gaza after the loss of a pair of Israeli military troops – leading, based on accounts, in scores of local casualties. A number of officials called for a renewal of the war, and the Knesset approved a initial decision to annex the West Bank. The American stance was somewhere ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the US leadership seems more focused on maintaining the present, tense phase of the ceasefire than on advancing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Concerning this, it seems the US may have goals but few tangible proposals.

Currently, it remains unclear at what point the proposed global oversight committee will actually begin operating, and the same applies to the proposed military contingent – or even the makeup of its soldiers. On a recent day, Vance stated the United States would not impose the membership of the foreign contingent on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration persists to refuse various proposals – as it acted with the Ankara's proposal lately – what occurs next? There is also the reverse question: which party will decide whether the troops supported by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The issue of how long it will need to demilitarize Hamas is similarly ambiguous. “The expectation in the leadership is that the global peacekeeping unit is will now assume responsibility in neutralizing Hamas,” stated Vance lately. “It’s going to take a while.” Trump only emphasized the ambiguity, stating in an interview a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to demilitarize. So, hypothetically, the unnamed elements of this still unformed global contingent could enter the territory while Hamas members continue to remain in control. Are they confronting a governing body or a militant faction? These are just a few of the concerns arising. Some might wonder what the result will be for average Palestinians under current conditions, with the group carrying on to target its own adversaries and dissidents.

Recent events have afresh highlighted the gaps of Israeli media coverage on both sides of the Gaza boundary. Every publication strives to analyze all conceivable angle of Hamas’s violations of the ceasefire. And, typically, the situation that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the remains of killed Israeli captives has monopolized the headlines.

Conversely, attention of civilian fatalities in Gaza resulting from Israeli operations has obtained scant attention – or none. Take the Israeli counter attacks after Sunday’s southern Gaza incident, in which two military personnel were lost. While Gaza’s authorities stated dozens of casualties, Israeli television analysts criticised the “moderate response,” which focused on solely facilities.

That is typical. Over the past few days, Gaza’s media office accused Israeli forces of violating the ceasefire with Hamas multiple times after the truce was implemented, resulting in the loss of dozens of Palestinians and wounding another many more. The allegation appeared unimportant to the majority of Israeli news programmes – it was just absent. This applied to accounts that 11 members of a Palestinian family were lost their lives by Israeli soldiers a few days ago.

Gaza’s civil defence agency stated the family had been seeking to return to their residence in the Zeitoun district of the city when the vehicle they were in was targeted for allegedly going over the “yellow line” that demarcates zones under Israeli military command. This yellow line is unseen to the ordinary view and appears only on maps and in authoritative papers – often not accessible to average residents in the region.

Yet that event hardly got a mention in Israeli media. A major outlet mentioned it briefly on its online platform, quoting an IDF representative who stated that after a suspect transport was detected, troops shot cautionary rounds towards it, “but the transport persisted to advance on the forces in a manner that caused an direct danger to them. The forces opened fire to eliminate the threat, in accordance with the agreement.” No casualties were stated.

Amid this perspective, it is no surprise many Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to at fault for violating the truce. That view could lead to fuelling demands for a stronger strategy in Gaza.

Eventually – maybe in the near future – it will not be enough for US envoys to act as supervisors, telling Israel what to avoid. They will {have to|need